A huge unmissable feature of Iceland is its geothermal energy. Strategically located in a volcanic zone, the country is home to one of the most reliable (available 365 days a year, unlike wind and solar energy) biodegradable energy. This leaves us no doubt that hot springs are a norm in such a place. Did you know, there are two different types of hot springs available- manmade and natural? I found time to visit one of each, to enlighten myself of their differences, and to learn more about the sustainability of running them.
Reykjadalur is a valley with a natural hot spring river running. It took us approximately an hour to hike to the swimming spot, but the hike was fun and there were occasional passing-by horses and their trainers. The air smelt like a mixture of sulphur, horse dung and grass. There were only a few wooden fences built next to the river to facilitate open changing of clothes and to my slight disappointment, the river was shallow to my calves. However, it was sufficient to submerge my body when I laid flat, and it was mildly filled with people. This open valley was a simple enjoyment if you like a free experience, since getting to enjoy a warm bath in the middle of nowhere is a luxury. No one seemed to be managing the place- only the visitors were holding each other accountable for not stealing clothes or leaving behind unwanted trash. Other than that, it was all natural- the heat, the river bed and everything.
Blue Lagoon, on the other hand, is one of the most commercialised tourist attractions near Reykjavik. The blue, chalky (thanks to the rich silica) water was not the only reason captivating visitors, its complete set of luxurious facilities that include a cafe, changing areas, free towels and a complimentary mud mask and drinks multiplied the charm. The lagoon was born when Svartsengi Resource Park started channeling excess geothermal energy to a neighbouring reservoir formed in a lava field. The energy-harvesting facility could be seen from the Blue Lagoon, and despite the overwhelmingly advertised benefits of the lagoon water and claims of sustainable adaptation of the facilities to its surrounding habitat, one can’t help but wonder if soaking in the lagoon is actually eco-friendly. For example, the need to build and maintain the spa and shower facilities could consume more energy and water than necessary. The drinks store located right in the middle of the lagoon promotes the use of disposable plastic cups/bottles for their visitors’ convenience, but rather, many irresponsible people leave their used cups by (or in) the ‘pool’. Visitors are charged GBP40 for the cheapest entry package, yet, flocks of tourists seem not to mind but continue to support this highly commercialised geotourism. For the experience, it was completely worth the price- but if one could get something entirely natural, why settle for something manmade?
By,
Euan Thum.
Comments
Post a Comment